1986 Ford Taurus vs. 2003 Proton 400
To start off, 2003 Proton 400 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Taurus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Taurus would be higher. At 2,513 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Ford Taurus (101 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2003 Proton 400. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 2003 Proton 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Ford Taurus weights approximately 430 kg more than 2003 Proton 400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Ford Taurus (187 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Proton 400. (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1986 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Proton 400.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Ford Taurus | 2003 Proton 400 | |
Make | Ford | Proton |
Model | Taurus | 400 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2513 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 187 Nm | 108 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2510 mm |