1986 Ford Taurus vs. 2012 Mazda BT-50

To start off, 2012 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Taurus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Taurus would be higher. At 2,606 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda BT-50 (123 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1986 Ford Taurus. (101 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Taurus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda BT-50 weights approximately 150 kg more than 1986 Ford Taurus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2012 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Ford Taurus. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda BT-50 (206 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Ford Taurus. (187 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2012 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Ford Taurus.

Compare all specifications:

1986 Ford Taurus 2012 Mazda BT-50
Make Ford Mazda
Model Taurus BT-50
Year Released 1986 2012
Body Type Station Wagon Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2513 cc 2606 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 101 HP 123 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 4600 RPM
Torque 187 Nm 206 Nm
Torque RPM 2700 RPM 3500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front 4WD
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1400 kg 1550 kg
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1810 mm
Wheelbase Size 2700 mm 3010 mm