1986 Ford Telstar vs. 2009 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Telstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Telstar would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Telstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Ford Telstar (94 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2009 Renault Clio. (81 HP @ 3750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Ford Telstar should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Renault Clio weights approximately 145 kg more than 1986 Ford Telstar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Renault Clio (200 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Ford Telstar. (159 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Ford Telstar.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Ford Telstar | 2009 Renault Clio | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Telstar | Clio |
Year Released | 1986 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1460 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Torque | 159 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2580 mm |