1986 Ford Telstar vs. 2010 Cadillac BLS

To start off, 2010 Cadillac BLS is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Telstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Telstar would be higher. Both 1986 Ford Telstar and 2010 Cadillac BLS are equipped with a 1,998 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac BLS (176 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1986 Ford Telstar. (94 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Telstar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 536 kg more than 1986 Ford Telstar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac BLS (265 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Ford Telstar. (159 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Ford Telstar. 2010 Cadillac BLS has automatic transmission and 1986 Ford Telstar has manual transmission. 1986 Ford Telstar will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Cadillac BLS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: