1986 Ford Telstar vs. 2012 Ford Ka
To start off, 2012 Ford Ka is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Telstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Telstar would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Telstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Ford Telstar (94 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2012 Ford Ka. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Ford Telstar should accelerate faster than 2012 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford Ka weights approximately 25 kg more than 1986 Ford Telstar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Ford Telstar (159 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Ford Ka. (145 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 1986 Ford Telstar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Ford Telstar | 2012 Ford Ka | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Telstar | Ka |
Year Released | 1986 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1247 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 159 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 3630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2310 mm |