1986 Ford Tempo vs. 1963 Volvo 120

To start off, 1986 Ford Tempo is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Ford Tempo (89 HP) has 22 more horse power than 1963 Volvo 120. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 1963 Volvo 120. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Ford Tempo weights approximately 95 kg more than 1963 Volvo 120. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 Volvo 120 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Volvo 120. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Ford Tempo (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Volvo 120. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 1986 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Volvo 120.

Compare all specifications: