1986 Ford Tempo vs. 1978 Volvo 240
To start off, 1986 Ford Tempo is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Volvo 240 (104 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1986 Ford Tempo. (89 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Volvo 240 should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Tempo.
Because 1978 Volvo 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Volvo 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Ford Tempo (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Volvo 240. (160 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1986 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Volvo 240.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Ford Tempo | 1978 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Tempo | 240 |
Year Released | 1986 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 2127 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2650 mm |