1986 Ford Tempo vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 1986 Ford Tempo is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Ford Tempo (89 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Ford Tempo weights approximately 335 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1986 Ford Tempo (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1986 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Ford Tempo | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Ford | Zastava |
| Model | Tempo | 102 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 170 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2160 mm |
