1986 Ford Tempo vs. 1983 Nissan Pulsar

To start off, 1986 Ford Tempo is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Ford Tempo (89 HP) has 19 more horse power than 1983 Nissan Pulsar. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 1983 Nissan Pulsar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Ford Tempo weights approximately 225 kg more than 1983 Nissan Pulsar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Ford Tempo (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Nissan Pulsar. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1986 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Nissan Pulsar. 1983 Nissan Pulsar has automatic transmission and 1986 Ford Tempo has manual transmission. 1986 Ford Tempo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1983 Nissan Pulsar will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: