1986 Ford Tempo vs. 1990 Renault Clio
To start off, 1990 Renault Clio is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Renault Clio (91 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1986 Ford Tempo. (89 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Ford Tempo weights approximately 200 kg more than 1990 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Ford Tempo (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Renault Clio. (141 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1986 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Ford Tempo | 1990 Renault Clio | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Tempo | Clio |
Year Released | 1986 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1721 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 141 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96.1 mm | 82.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 83.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 905 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1400 mm |