1986 Ford Tempo vs. 2003 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1986 Ford Tempo. (89 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 515 kg more than 1986 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Cadillac CTS (245 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Ford Tempo. (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2003 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Ford Tempo. 2003 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 1986 Ford Tempo has manual transmission. 1986 Ford Tempo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Ford Tempo | 2003 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Ford | Cadillac |
Model | Tempo | CTS |
Year Released | 1986 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 2597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 179 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 245 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96.1 mm | 83.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 79.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 1620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2890 mm |