1986 Ford Tempo vs. 2005 Mazda B3000
To start off, 2005 Mazda B3000 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mazda B3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda B3000 (154 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1986 Ford Tempo. (89 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda B3000 should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda B3000 weights approximately 566 kg more than 1986 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda B3000 (240 Nm) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Ford Tempo. (170 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda B3000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Ford Tempo | 2005 Mazda B3000 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Tempo | B3000 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2307 cc | 2966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 154 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 170 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 1671 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 3200 mm |
