1986 Ford Tempo vs. 2008 Honda HR-V
To start off, 2008 Honda HR-V is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Honda HR-V weights approximately 152 kg more than 1986 Ford Tempo.
Because 2008 Honda HR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Ford Tempo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Honda HR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Ford Tempo (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Honda HR-V. (135 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1986 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Honda HR-V.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Ford Tempo | 2008 Honda HR-V | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | Tempo | HR-V |
Year Released | 1986 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 170 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96.1 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 90 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 1257 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2460 mm |