1986 Ford Tempo vs. 2008 Nissan Note
To start off, 2008 Nissan Note is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Ford Tempo (89 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2008 Nissan Note. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 2008 Nissan Note. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Note weights approximately 134 kg more than 1986 Ford Tempo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Ford Tempo (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Nissan Note. (160 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1986 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Nissan Note.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Ford Tempo | 2008 Nissan Note | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Tempo | Note |
Year Released | 1986 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 1239 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2610 mm |