1986 Ford Tempo vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1986 Ford Tempo. (89 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 87 kg more than 1986 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Ford Tempo (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 3. (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1986 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Ford Tempo | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Tempo | 3 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1598 cc |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 170 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 96.1 mm | 78.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 83.6 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 1192 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2650 mm |
