1986 Ford Tempo vs. 2010 Ford Ka
To start off, 2010 Ford Ka is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Ford Tempo (89 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2010 Ford Ka. (68 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Ka.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Ford Tempo (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford Ka. (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1986 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Ford Tempo | 2010 Ford Ka | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Tempo | Ka |
Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 68 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 106 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96.1 mm | 74.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 75.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2450 mm |