1986 Ford Tempo vs. 2013 Kia RIO
To start off, 2013 Kia RIO is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Kia RIO (136 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1986 Ford Tempo. (89 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Kia RIO should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Ford Tempo weights approximately 9 kg more than 2013 Kia RIO.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Ford Tempo (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Kia RIO. (167 Nm @ 4850 RPM). This means 1986 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Kia RIO.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Ford Tempo | 2013 Kia RIO | |
Make | Ford | Kia |
Model | Tempo | RIO |
Year Released | 1986 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 136 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 167 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 4850 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96.1 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 85 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 1096 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4045 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1455 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2570 mm |