1986 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1986 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Ford Thunderbird (162 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 438 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1986 Ford Thunderbird (241 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1986 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Ford Thunderbird | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Thunderbird | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1986 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2299 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 162 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 241 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1378 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 57 L |