1986 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1982 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1986 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,563 cc, 1982 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Ford Thunderbird (162 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1982 Toyota Celica. (119 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1982 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 198 kg more than 1982 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1986 Ford Thunderbird (241 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Toyota Celica. (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1986 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Ford Thunderbird | 1982 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | Thunderbird | Celica |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2299 cc | 2563 cc |
| Horse Power | 162 HP | 119 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 241 Nm | 215 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1378 kg | 1180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2640 mm |
