1986 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 452 kg more than 1986 Ford Thunderbird.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Ford Thunderbird | 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Thunderbird | Challenger |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2299 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 162 HP | 0 HP |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1378 kg | 1830 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2730 mm |
