1986 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2009 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Ford Thunderbird (162 HP) has 8 more horse power than 2009 Citroen C-Crosser. (154 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2009 Citroen C-Crosser.
Because 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser (380 Nm) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Ford Thunderbird. (241 Nm). This means 2009 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Ford Thunderbird.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Ford Thunderbird | 2009 Citroen C-Crosser | |
| Make | Ford | Citroen |
| Model | Thunderbird | C-Crosser |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2299 cc | 2179 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 162 HP | 154 HP |
| Torque | 241 Nm | 380 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79.4 mm | 96 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
