1986 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2010 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2010 Holden Commodore is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 198 more horse power than 1986 Ford Thunderbird. (162 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Thunderbird.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Ford Thunderbird. (241 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Ford Thunderbird.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Ford Thunderbird | 2010 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | Thunderbird | Commodore |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2299 cc | 5976 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 162 HP | 360 HP |
| Torque | 241 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
