1986 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2011 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2011 Ford Ecosport is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Ford Thunderbird (162 HP) has 95 more horse power than 2011 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2011 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1986 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Ford Thunderbird | 2011 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | Thunderbird | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2299 cc | 1400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 162 HP | 67 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2490 mm |
