1986 Holden Astra vs. 1973 Lincoln Continental

To start off, 1986 Holden Astra is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,542 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Lincoln Continental (217 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 1986 Holden Astra. (70 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 1986 Holden Astra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 1439 kg more than 1986 Holden Astra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1973 Lincoln Continental is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Lincoln Continental. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Holden Astra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Lincoln Continental (488 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 364 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Holden Astra. (124 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1973 Lincoln Continental will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Holden Astra. 1973 Lincoln Continental has automatic transmission and 1986 Holden Astra has manual transmission. 1986 Holden Astra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1973 Lincoln Continental will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: