1986 Holden Astra vs. 1974 Mazda RX-3
To start off, 1986 Holden Astra is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda RX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda RX-3 would be higher. At 1,962 cc, 1974 Mazda RX-3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Mazda RX-3 (100 HP) has 30 more horse power than 1986 Holden Astra. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Mazda RX-3 should accelerate faster than 1986 Holden Astra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Holden Astra weights approximately 5 kg more than 1974 Mazda RX-3.
Because 1974 Mazda RX-3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Mazda RX-3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Holden Astra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1974 Mazda RX-3 (135 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Holden Astra. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1974 Mazda RX-3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Holden Astra.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Holden Astra | 1974 Mazda RX-3 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | Astra | RX-3 |
Year Released | 1986 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1486 cc | 1962 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 100 HP |
Torque | 115 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 855 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2320 mm |