1986 Holden Astra vs. 2003 MCC Smart

To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Holden Astra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Holden Astra would be higher. At 1,486 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Holden Astra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MCC Smart (73 HP) has 3 more horse power than 1986 Holden Astra. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1986 Holden Astra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MCC Smart weights approximately 115 kg more than 1986 Holden Astra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Holden Astra (115 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (100 Nm). This means 1986 Holden Astra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart. 2003 MCC Smart has automatic transmission and 1986 Holden Astra has manual transmission. 1986 Holden Astra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 MCC Smart will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: