1986 Holden Astra vs. 2004 Mazda 2
To start off, 2004 Mazda 2 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Holden Astra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Holden Astra would be higher. At 1,486 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Holden Astra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Holden Astra (70 HP) has 3 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 2. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Holden Astra should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 2 weights approximately 930 kg more than 1986 Holden Astra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 2 (160 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Holden Astra. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2004 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Holden Astra.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Holden Astra | 2004 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | Astra | 2 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1486 cc | 1399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 115 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 855 kg | 1785 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2680 mm |