1986 Holden Astra vs. 2006 Mazda CX-7
To start off, 2006 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Holden Astra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Holden Astra would be higher. At 2,298 cc, 2006 Mazda CX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda CX-7 (244 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 174 more horse power than 1986 Holden Astra. (70 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda CX-7 should accelerate faster than 1986 Holden Astra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda CX-7 (350 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 226 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Holden Astra. (124 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda CX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Holden Astra. 2006 Mazda CX-7 has automatic transmission and 1986 Holden Astra has manual transmission. 1986 Holden Astra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Mazda CX-7 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Holden Astra | 2006 Mazda CX-7 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | Astra | CX-7 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 2298 cc |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 244 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 350 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |