1986 Holden Astra vs. 2006 Suzuki Reno
To start off, 2006 Suzuki Reno is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Holden Astra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Holden Astra would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Suzuki Reno is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Suzuki Reno (126 HP) has 56 more horse power than 1986 Holden Astra. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Suzuki Reno should accelerate faster than 1986 Holden Astra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Suzuki Reno weights approximately 210 kg more than 1986 Holden Astra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Suzuki Reno (178 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Holden Astra. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Suzuki Reno will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Holden Astra.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Holden Astra | 2006 Suzuki Reno | |
Make | Holden | Suzuki |
Model | Astra | Reno |
Year Released | 1986 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1486 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 126 HP |
Torque | 115 Nm | 178 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 855 kg | 1065 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2610 mm |