1986 Holden Astra vs. 2009 Ascari KZ1

To start off, 2009 Ascari KZ1 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Holden Astra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Holden Astra would be higher. At 4,941 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ascari KZ1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ascari KZ1 (500 HP) has 430 more horse power than 1986 Holden Astra. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ascari KZ1 should accelerate faster than 1986 Holden Astra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ascari KZ1 weights approximately 495 kg more than 1986 Holden Astra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2009 Ascari KZ1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ascari KZ1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Holden Astra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ascari KZ1 (550 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 435 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Holden Astra. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Ascari KZ1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Holden Astra.

Compare all specifications: