1986 Holden Astra vs. 2009 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2009 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Holden Astra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Holden Astra would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volkswagen Polo (149 HP) has 79 more horse power than 1986 Holden Astra. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1986 Holden Astra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volkswagen Polo (220 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Holden Astra. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Volkswagen Polo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Holden Astra.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Holden Astra | 2009 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Holden | Volkswagen |
Model | Astra | Polo |
Year Released | 1986 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1486 cc | 1781 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 149 HP |
Torque | 115 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 1950 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2470 mm |