1986 Holden Astra vs. 2010 Renault Megane
To start off, 2010 Renault Megane is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Holden Astra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Holden Astra would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Megane (111 HP) has 41 more horse power than 1986 Holden Astra. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1986 Holden Astra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Renault Megane (152 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Holden Astra. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2010 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Holden Astra.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Holden Astra | 2010 Renault Megane | |
Make | Holden | Renault |
Model | Astra | Megane |
Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1486 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 111 HP |
Torque | 115 Nm | 152 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2690 mm |