1986 Holden Astra vs. 2011 Toyota Matrix

To start off, 2011 Toyota Matrix is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Holden Astra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Holden Astra would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Toyota Matrix (132 HP) has 62 more horse power than 1986 Holden Astra. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1986 Holden Astra.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Toyota Matrix (173 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Holden Astra. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2011 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Holden Astra. 2011 Toyota Matrix has automatic transmission and 1986 Holden Astra has manual transmission. 1986 Holden Astra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Toyota Matrix will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1986 Holden Astra 2011 Toyota Matrix
Make Holden Toyota
Model Astra Matrix
Year Released 1986 2011
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1486 cc 1800 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 70 HP 132 HP
Torque 115 Nm 173 Nm
Torque RPM 3200 RPM 4400 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Vehicle Length 3970 mm 4366 mm
Vehicle Width 1630 mm 1765 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1549 mm
Wheelbase Size 2420 mm 2601 mm