1986 Holden Camira vs. 1989 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 1989 Toyota Lite Ace is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Holden Camira. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Holden Camira would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Holden Camira is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Toyota Lite Ace weights approximately 85 kg more than 1986 Holden Camira.
Because 1989 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Holden Camira, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Holden Camira | 1989 Toyota Lite Ace | |
| Make | Holden | Toyota |
| Model | Camira | Lite Ace |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1989 |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1910 mm |
