1986 Holden Camira vs. 1995 Pininfarina Argento
To start off, 1995 Pininfarina Argento is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Holden Camira. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Holden Camira would be higher. At 2,501 cc (5 cylinders), 1995 Pininfarina Argento is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Pininfarina Argento (190 HP) has 107 more horse power than 1986 Holden Camira. (83 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Pininfarina Argento should accelerate faster than 1986 Holden Camira.
Because 1995 Pininfarina Argento is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Pininfarina Argento. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Holden Camira, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Holden Camira | 1995 Pininfarina Argento | |
| Make | Holden | Pininfarina |
| Model | Camira | Argento |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 2501 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 190 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
