1986 Holden Camira vs. 2005 Renault Clio

To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Holden Camira. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Holden Camira would be higher. Both 1986 Holden Camira and 2005 Renault Clio are equipped with a 1,598 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Clio (108 HP @ 3750 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1986 Holden Camira. (83 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1986 Holden Camira. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Clio weights approximately 90 kg more than 1986 Holden Camira. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Renault Clio (148 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Holden Camira. (126 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2005 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Holden Camira.

Compare all specifications:

1986 Holden Camira 2005 Renault Clio
Make Holden Renault
Model Camira Clio
Year Released 1986 2005
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1598 cc 1598 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 83 HP 108 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 3750 RPM
Torque 126 Nm 148 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 3750 RPM
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1015 kg 1105 kg
Vehicle Length 4350 mm 3780 mm
Vehicle Width 1670 mm 1650 mm
Vehicle Height 1360 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2410 mm