1986 Holden Camira vs. 2005 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2005 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Holden Camira. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Holden Camira would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Holden Camira is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volkswagen Polo (149 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1986 Holden Camira. (83 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1986 Holden Camira. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 45 kg more than 1986 Holden Camira. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Holden Camira (126 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Volkswagen Polo. (115 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1986 Holden Camira will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Holden Camira | 2005 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Holden | Volkswagen |
Model | Camira | Polo |
Year Released | 1986 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1423 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 126 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1060 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2520 mm |