1986 Holden Camira vs. 2009 Holden UTE
To start off, 2009 Holden UTE is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Holden Camira. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Holden Camira would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 274 more horse power than 1986 Holden Camira. (83 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1986 Holden Camira.
Because 2009 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Holden Camira, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 404 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Holden Camira. (126 Nm). This means 2009 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Holden Camira.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Holden Camira | 2009 Holden UTE | |
Make | Holden | Holden |
Model | Camira | UTE |
Year Released | 1986 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 357 HP |
Torque | 126 Nm | 530 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |