1986 Holden Commodore vs. 1960 Lotus Seven
To start off, 1986 Holden Commodore is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 3,298 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Holden Commodore (116 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1960 Lotus Seven. (36 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1960 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Holden Commodore weights approximately 785 kg more than 1960 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Holden Commodore | 1960 Lotus Seven | |
Make | Holden | Lotus |
Model | Commodore | Seven |
Year Released | 1986 | 1960 |
Body Type | Sedan | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3298 cc | 946 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 116 HP | 36 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 435 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2240 mm |