1986 Holden Commodore vs. 1979 Renault 20
To start off, 1986 Holden Commodore is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Renault 20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Renault 20 would be higher. At 2,962 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Holden Commodore weights approximately 50 kg more than 1979 Renault 20.
Because 1986 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Renault 20, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Holden Commodore | 1979 Renault 20 | |
Make | Holden | Renault |
Model | Commodore | 20 |
Year Released | 1986 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2962 cc | 1647 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2670 mm |