1986 Holden Commodore vs. 2000 Mahindra Bolero
To start off, 2000 Mahindra Bolero is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Holden Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Holden Commodore would be higher. At 2,962 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Holden Commodore (201 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 2000 Mahindra Bolero. (62 HP @ 3200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2000 Mahindra Bolero. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mahindra Bolero weights approximately 545 kg more than 1986 Holden Commodore.
Because 2000 Mahindra Bolero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mahindra Bolero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Holden Commodore (296 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mahindra Bolero. (166 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 1986 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mahindra Bolero.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Holden Commodore | 2000 Mahindra Bolero | |
Make | Holden | Mahindra |
Model | Commodore | Bolero |
Year Released | 1986 | 2000 |
Engine Size | 2962 cc | 2523 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Torque | 296 Nm | 166 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1780 kg |