1986 Holden Commodore vs. 2006 Mazda 6

To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Holden Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Holden Commodore would be higher. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1986 Holden Commodore. (153 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1986 Holden Commodore. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Holden Commodore weights approximately 86 kg more than 2006 Mazda 6.

Because 1986 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 6 (270 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Holden Commodore. (247 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Holden Commodore.

Compare all specifications:

1986 Holden Commodore 2006 Mazda 6
Make Holden Mazda
Model Commodore 6
Year Released 1986 2006
Body Type Sedan Station Wagon
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2962 cc 2966 cc
Horse Power 153 HP 215 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 247 Nm 270 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 5000 RPM
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1215 kg 1129 kg
Vehicle Length 4770 mm 4750 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2670 mm 2680 mm