1986 Honda Accord vs. 1982 Mazda 626
To start off, 1986 Honda Accord is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,954 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Honda Accord is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Honda Accord weights approximately 30 kg more than 1982 Mazda 626.
Because 1982 Mazda 626 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Mazda 626. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Honda Accord, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Honda Accord | 1982 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Honda | Mazda |
Model | Accord | 626 |
Year Released | 1986 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1954 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1075 kg | 1045 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2520 mm |