1986 Honda Accord vs. 2011 Renault Clio
To start off, 2011 Renault Clio is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Honda Accord. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Honda Accord would be higher. At 1,953 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Honda Accord is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Honda Accord (120 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2011 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Honda Accord should accelerate faster than 2011 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Honda Accord (166 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Renault Clio. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1986 Honda Accord will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Honda Accord | 2011 Renault Clio | |
Make | Honda | Renault |
Model | Accord | Clio |
Year Released | 1986 | 2011 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1953 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 166 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.7 mm | 69 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 76.8 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2480 mm |