1986 Honda Jazz vs. 2009 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Honda Jazz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Honda Jazz would be higher. At 3,727 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (268 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 224 more horse power than 1986 Honda Jazz. (44 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1986 Honda Jazz.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (269 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 187 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Honda Jazz. (82 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Honda Jazz.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Honda Jazz | 2009 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Honda | Mazda |
Model | Jazz | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2009 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1231 cc | 3727 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 268 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 82 Nm | 269 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2340 mm |