1986 Jaguar XJ6 vs. 1978 Volvo 240
To start off, 1986 Jaguar XJ6 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 2,918 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Jaguar XJ6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Jaguar XJ6 (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1978 Volvo 240. (104 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Jaguar XJ6 should accelerate faster than 1978 Volvo 240.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Jaguar XJ6 (239 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Volvo 240. (160 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1986 Jaguar XJ6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Volvo 240.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Jaguar XJ6 | 1978 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Jaguar | Volvo |
Model | XJ6 | 240 |
Year Released | 1986 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2918 cc | 2127 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 239 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2650 mm |