1986 Jaguar XJ6 vs. 1998 Lotus GT 1
To start off, 1998 Lotus GT 1 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Jaguar XJ6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Jaguar XJ6 would be higher. At 3,590 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Jaguar XJ6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Lotus GT 1 (580 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 359 more horse power than 1986 Jaguar XJ6. (221 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Lotus GT 1 should accelerate faster than 1986 Jaguar XJ6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Jaguar XJ6 weights approximately 720 kg more than 1998 Lotus GT 1.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Lotus GT 1 (391 Nm @ 6500 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Jaguar XJ6. (336 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1998 Lotus GT 1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Jaguar XJ6.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Jaguar XJ6 | 1998 Lotus GT 1 | |
Make | Jaguar | Lotus |
Model | XJ6 | GT 1 |
Year Released | 1986 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3590 cc | 3506 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 221 HP | 580 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 7500 RPM |
Torque | 336 Nm | 391 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Top Speed | 214 km/hour | 313 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1770 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 2080 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1110 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2320 mm |