1986 Jaguar XJ6 vs. 2004 Mitsubishi eK
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi eK is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Jaguar XJ6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Jaguar XJ6 would be higher. At 3,590 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Jaguar XJ6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Jaguar XJ6 weights approximately 980 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi eK.
Because 1986 Jaguar XJ6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Jaguar XJ6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi eK, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Jaguar XJ6 | 2004 Mitsubishi eK | |
Make | Jaguar | Mitsubishi |
Model | XJ6 | eK |
Year Released | 1986 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3590 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 221 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1770 kg | 790 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2350 mm |