1986 Jaguar XJR vs. 1992 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1992 Lotus Elan is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 6,499 cc (12 cylinders), 1986 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Jaguar XJR (671 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 508 more horse power than 1992 Lotus Elan. (163 HP @ 6600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 1992 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Lotus Elan weights approximately 160 kg more than 1986 Jaguar XJR.
Because 1986 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Lotus Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Jaguar XJR | 1992 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Jaguar | Lotus |
Model | XJR | Elan |
Year Released | 1986 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 6499 cc | 1587 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 671 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 860 kg | 1020 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 3810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2260 mm |