1986 Jaguar XJR vs. 2000 Volvo C70
To start off, 2000 Volvo C70 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 6,499 cc (12 cylinders), 1986 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Jaguar XJR (671 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 510 more horse power than 2000 Volvo C70. (161 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 2000 Volvo C70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Volvo C70 weights approximately 544 kg more than 1986 Jaguar XJR.
Because 1986 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Jaguar XJR | 2000 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Jaguar | Volvo |
Model | XJR | C70 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 6499 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 671 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 860 kg | 1404 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 68 L |